Editorial Policy

All submitted papers will undergo a blind peer review conducted by qualified reviewers.
The review process evaluates:
1. Relevance to the symposium theme
2. Scientific and technical quality
3. Originality and novelty
4. Clarity of presentation
Decisions include: acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection.

The conference adheres to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines .
Authors must ensure:
1. Originality of work
2. Proper citation of sources
3. Disclosure of conflicts of interest
4. Ethical treatment of research subjects (if applicable)

Manuscripts must not exceed a similarity index of 20%, with no more than 5% from any single source. Plagiarism in any form will result in immediate rejection.

All listed authors must have made significant contributions to the research. Changes in authorship after submission are only allowed with written consent from all authors and approval from the editorial committee.